RAIReady helps organisations answer the practical questions behind AI approval, ongoing use and accountability. These examples are illustrative, not client claims.
RAIReady response: Classify the use, connect clinical, privacy and security obligations to evidence, separate clinical ownership from assurance review, and record the accountable decision.
Discuss a clinical AI decisionRAIReady response: Test the assessment basis, controls and evaluation evidence; document limitations and findings; then keep the approved position under review as models and suppliers change.
See the assurance processRAIReady response: Create a traceable assurance case showing purpose, affected people, evidence, independent judgement, remediation and the authority behind the decision.
Explore engagement optionsRAIReady response: Apply a consistent assessment while distinguishing each context, gather evidence from owners and suppliers, and escalate material gaps before approval or wider use.
Discuss an education AI useRAIReady response: Link product claims, architecture, evaluations and supplier evidence to controls, identify unanswered questions, and produce a current assurance position for customers and governance teams.
See supplier assuranceRAIReady response: Maintain one inventory, prioritise exceptions, assign evidence and remediation, monitor decision dates and give executives a portfolio view with the basis behind every measure.
Explore the platform approachTurn a discovered or proposed AI use into a documented assurance position.
Move from collected evidence to an independent judgement and accountable approval.
Bring material change back through assurance before the original basis goes stale.
Establish scope, inherent risk, required controls, evidence and the approval path before operational exposure begins.
Bring unregistered AI into the inventory, establish its current use and reconstruct the evidence behind the operating decision.
Assess whether a product release, changed terms, incident or public disclosure makes the existing assurance position stale.
Return the item to its owner, refresh the evidence and require a new dated judgement rather than silently carrying the old one forward.
Record the executive's challenge, the assurance response and the outcome without overwriting the original assessment history.
Produce a versioned report that states the conclusion, supporting evidence, open gaps, limitations and accountable decision-makers.
